Monday, September 10, 2007

As a Side Note...

Today I was presented with a very interesting situation.  Someone read my blog and told me I couldn’t prove anything I’ve written about historical things.  And you know what?  They’re right.  I can’t prove any of it.  I’ve never gone on an archaeological dig, or discovered any lost cities, but am only sharing with you what I’ve read (which not to brag, but is a considerable amount).

 

So what, I can’t prove it, and I'll admit that.  I can show you my reference books, but beyond that I can't.  That’s not what it’s about though. It’s not deciding whether the Battle of Salamis was 480 BC or 481 BC, it’s about causing people to think about the decisions they’ve been presented differently and reflecting on their personal pasts.  It's about presently a different way of seeing things, and I won't promise it'll always be little bunnies hopping around in wonderland.

 

No, as much as I would like otherwise, it probably won’t matter whether Cortez landed with 100 or 600 men in anyone's future.  But it will matter in applying this to other, more important, things – making it useful in later situations, not just as some random fact to spew off.

 

So no, I can’t prove any of it.  But its about what you believe.  Maybe what I say may help bring about some thought, or just a way to pass the time when your bored.  I admit, it’s not always applicable to everyday life, but I do promise it will make you see things from a different perspective.

 

While I’m at it, I might as well also bring up that I would never say something unless I had plenty of good, reliable sources.  I would never lie to anyone about anything historical or otherwise on this site.

 

I thought this was important to say, not that all of my readers, or even most of my readers think this.  This was just one person in particular who said this to me, and I thought I'd bring it up.

 


Tags: ,

Sunday, September 9, 2007

Favorite Article #1

All the sudden I was divinely inspired that after every 10 articles I write I should poll which article was your favorite.  This way I know what I should write more about and what I should write less about.  And after you vote, please comment about why you chose what you chose, so that I can get more information from there as well.  So... you know what to do!  Oh, and if you can't decide on just one article, please feel free to vote more than once on this poll (just this poll, try not to do that on others unless otherwise specified).  =)

Tree Kangaroo

I was reading the latest National Geographic and I was flipping through it looking at the pictures (that magazine the greatest pictures ever!) and I found a picture of what must be the most adorable thing ever - a tree kangaroo (Matschie's Tree Kangaroo below)!  If you have the September edition leaf through to the Expeditions Department.

The actual article is sad - it talks about how the kangaroos are being ousted by loggers and hunted by villagers for their tails to decorate their headresses (AWWW)!  I have to say that is the coolest tail ever, and if I were to get a tail, that would so be the one I'd pick!

If you do get it and have some spare time read "Tales From the Bog".  It's a really cool article about the bodies of Celts buried in the peat bogs of Europe.  I liked it.  The pictures in the Glacier Park article are a must-see too!  Oh, and I almost forgot "Vesuvius Countdown" was good too!

Episodes of Woody

Why does history matter?  I’m presented this question commonly, and have always stumbled in finding a decent answer, but due to recent experiences, I think I’ve come up with an answer – so you don’t look like an idiot to the people who actually do know history.  This came across me over the last few weeks listening to a certain person I know babble on inaccurately about history, and unfortunately for me relationship inhibits me from correctly him.  For the purposes of this post (and maybe others) I’ll refer to this person as “Woody”.  Just so you know, Woody is not a reader of this blog (as far as I know), and I’m sure some of you have heard of this person, but I doubt any of you know him personally.

 

I can understand not liking history like I do, it’s not really common and I get that.  But Woody is WAY off, and it doesn’t take a history buff to figure that out quickly.  And the sad thing is, he’s a bit of a self-proclaimed genius, so he seriously thinks he’s right, and he likes to show off his “mad history skills” at the drop of a hat.

 

Here’s one history lesson taught by my dear friend Woody:

 

Cortez and 100 Spaniards arrive on the coast of North America where they are greeted by an army of thousands of Aztecs and their leader Montezuma.  Due to the shiny armor of the Spaniards and their dignified posture, they scared off the vast army of Aztecs.  They then marched into Tenoctitlan, unopposed and were running the city within a week.

 

Wow.  Ya, you see my point now?  It’s insane.  I feel all bottled up not being able to throw back some history into his face, but like I said, if I did… well it’s kind of an employer-employee relationship so if I did it wouldn’t be worth it.

Anyway, the real thing went something more like this:

 

Cortez (pictured below) and 600 Spaniards leave Cuba and land on the coast of Mexico.  They march to Tenoctitlan along the way gathering together an army of tribes that had been waiting for any reason to revolt against their Aztec masters.  It’s fact that their were actually more native Mexicans in the army of Cortez than in the army of Montezuma (technically Montezuma II, but is generally referred to as just Montezuma) when they finally fought, which doesn’t come until later.  So Cortez reached the city, and all the while Montezuma was unresolved on his position with the Spaniards, and finally decided to let things go for the time being.

 

Well no matter the decision of the Aztec king, Cortez believed that efforts were going to be made to drive him out of the city, so he took Montezuma hostage and made him swear loyalty to Charles I.  An enormous some of gold and jewels ransom was demanded.  Another series of events occurred with Cortez momentarily leaving the city and coming back with more Spanish that I won’t go into much detail about.  So he came back to find the Aztec citizens had revolted against the Spanish and their imprisoned leader.  He was allowed into the city, but was immediately surrounded and attacked.  Upon his request, Montezuma was to address the people to try to quell the revolution, but failed and was stoned to death three days later.

The Spanish were pushed out of the city and had to resupply at Vera Cruz before returning and commencing a three-month siege that eventually led to the victory of Cortez.

 

Yup, so I just had to post that.  Maybe I’ll present episodes of botched history from Woody later, but for now I just wanted to use him as an example why history matters.

Oh, do you remember that article I wrote about how 300 wasn’t very historically accurate?  Well about that time, right around when I had JUST written that post, he told me he was so happy that 300 was such a historically accurate movie.  Ha, ha… no joke.  I felt like I was going to explode.


 
 
 

Tags: ,

Monotheism

I had this revelation of renewed interest in Don't Know Much About Mythology since writing the "Floods" article, so I was paging through it looking for something interesting to share with you.  And so the Spirit moved me to pick a little controversial sounding title in the Egypt section:

Did a pharaoh inspire Moses to worship one god?

“Even as Egypt became the world's greatest power, it fell into disarray over religious politics, an intriguing moment in history that might provide a valuable lesson about the volatile combination of belief and government.  During his reign, the pharaoh Amenhotep IV (1352-1336 BC) made a remarkable and radical - if somewhat mysterious and unexplained - decision.  Amenhotep severed all links with the traditional religious capital of Egypt in Memphis and its god Amun-Re, chose Aten as the only god of Egypt, and set out to build an entirely new city devoted to this god.  Located about two hundred miles north of Thebes, the city is known today by the name "Amarna," and this period is called the "Amarna Revolution."  It affected Egypt in its time as profoundly as the Protestant Reformation affected Europe.”

“Aten had previously been a little-known god worshipped in Thebes.  Unlike Re and the other gods, Aten, whose name meant "disc of the Sun," had no human characteristics.  Aten was depicted only as a sun from which rays emanated, ending in hands that held the ankh, Egyptian symbol of life.  Amenhotep was so devoted to the worship of Aten that he changed his name to Akhenaten.  Akhenaten's wife Nefertiti was his supporter in this transformation, taking on the role of priestess and assisting Akhenaten in the new religious ceremonies.  Supposedly one of the most beautiful women in Egyptian history, Nefertiti is the subject of several sculptured portraits that have survived from ancient times.  She and Akhenaten began a full-scale attempt to wipe out references to all other gods.  Throughout Egypt, statues to Amun-Re were smashed and the god's name was literally chiseled out of monuments.  State temples were torn down, and the traditional religious festivals and public holidays were no longer celebrated.  The reason for this radical reformation - the equivalent of the a modern American president trying to wipe out any reference of Christianity in America and banning Christmas, Easter, and other religious holidays - are uncertain.  There may have been a political reason behind Akhenaten's purge of the other gods.”

“Within a short time, the vast state mechanism of religion had been reduced to worship of a single god led by one man, the pharaoh.  Only he and Nefertiti could communicate with this god.  As popes and other religious leaders have well understood over the centuries, the professed ability to communicate exclusively with the gods is a great way to consolidate power.”

“After Akhenaten's death, the Egyptians stopped worshipping Aten.  The new pharaoh, Tutankhamun, began the restoration of the old gods, and traditional worship was completely restored under Horemheb, a general in Tut's service, who managed to secure the throne for himself after the death of Tut's successor, and then leveled Amarna.”

“But for years, many scholars have argued that the worship of this one divinity lingered among the people of Israel, who, according to biblical accounts, had lived in Egypt for hundreds of years.  And that creates another interesting collision of myth and faith.  The concept of one god became an important part of the religion that was developed by the Israelite leader Moses.  The history of the cult of Aten had led to the suggestion that the Jewish and Christian belief in one God may have been derived from Egyptian worship.  Among the proponents of this idea was Sigmund Freud, who laid out his theory in his final book, Moses and Monotheism.  Or perhaps the other way around.  As Bruce Feiler writes in his best seller Walking the Bible, "Might the Israelites have learned to worship one god following the lead of some maverick pharaoh?  Or might the Egyptians have the learned the same thing by taking an idea from the patriarchs?"

“In traditional Jewish and Christian view, such questions are heresy.  But they point to the reason why mythology matters.  Cultures collide.  Myths are absorbed in the aftermath of the collision.  The ideas of one civilization are borrowed and remolded by another.  There is no question that the Egyptians profoundly influenced the Greeks in their beliefs and practices.  Is it reasonalbe to ask if they had done the same to the ancient Hebrews.  Aten's monotheistic revolution raises a beguiling set of questions.  Where do the Hebrews, the twelve tribes of Israel, fit into Egyptian history?  And did these Egyptian ideas influence the man who brought Israelites out of Egypt adn delivered God's biblical law on a set of tablets received on Mount Sinai?”

“This is where myth and history collide - and it is one of the fundamental reasons to understand mythology.  Where is one faith or religion - or mythology - born?  Whose divinely revealed truth is the one and only truth?”

“Other intriguing questions surface, the foremost of which involve Moses.  In spire of his exalted status in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam - Moses is referred to fifty times in the Koran, which credits him with negotiating with God down to Islam's five prayers a day - Moses is a mystery man.  There is no evidence of his existence in any historical documents outside the Bible or Koran.  Extensive Egyptian records contain no reference to a Moses - an Egyptian name; it is Moshe in Hebrew - raised in the house of a pharaoh, as the biblical account and the Hollywood version of The Ten Commandments have it.  There is also no reference in Egypt's ancient monuments of bureaucratic records to "the children of Israel" working as slaves and then escaping en masse.  There is a single reference to a battle with Hebrews in a victory column - or stela - erected by Pharaoh Merneptah.”

“This lack of historical records has led many scholars over centuries to doubt the existence of Moses.  That is, of course, a radical idea to many believers, since the story of Moses leading the captive Hebrews out of Egypt, miraculously crossing the "Red Sea" - a mistranslation of the words for "Sea of Reeds" - and entering the wilderness, where they spent forty years before entering the Promised Land, is the essence of Judaism.  It also provides important symbolic connections to the life of Jesus.”

“The biblical account of the sojourn of the Hebrews in Egypt goes back to the story of Joseph, one of the twelve sons of the patriarch Jacob (son of Isaac, grandson of Abraham).  The favorite son, Joseph was famed for his "coat of many colors," but was envied by his brothers, who sold him into slavery and told their father that Joseph was killed while tending sheep.  Taken to Egypt, Joseph eventually rose to become a counselor to the Egyptian throne because of his uncanny ability to interpret dreams.  One biblical account tells the story of how the wife of Potiphar, Joseph’s master, accused Joseph of attempting to rape her after he had actually rejected the woman’s advances.  This story, told in Genesis, echoes an old Egyptian folktale called “The Tale of Two Brothers,” which contains all the details that were presumably “sampled,” in modern terms, by the authors of Genesis.”

“The Joseph story continues as, years later, his brothers come to Egypt in the midst of a drought in their land and are brought before Joseph, now a highly placed advisor to the pharaoh.  The brothers do not realize who Joseph is, but he recognizes them, and in an act of forgiveness Joseph is reconciled with his brothers who had sold him.  Joseph’s father, Jacob – or Israel, as he is called – and all his descendents make the trip to Egypt, where they are welcomed by Joseph.”

“After hundreds of years in Egypt, in the biblical version, the Hebrews are eventually viewed as a threat to the pharaoh – unidentified in the Bible – and they are enslaved, put to work building cities and fortifications.  Eventually the pharaoh is so worried about these Israelites that he orders the killing of their firstborn.  A Jewish woman places her child in a basket of reeds to save his life.  Found floating in the Nile by the daughter of the pharaoh, the child – Moses – is raised as a prince in the royal house.  Moses later sees an Egyptian beating a Hebrew worker and he kills the Egyptian.  Frightened, Moses leaves Egypt, has a divine encounter with God in the form of a burning bush, and returns to Egypt to set his people free.  After the ten plagues are visited upon the Egyptians, the pharaoh – usually identifies as Ramses II, but there is considerable disagreement over that - consents to let Moses leave with his people, who cross into the Sinai Desert, and receive the Ten Commandments; then, after more tribulations, they eventually enter Canaan, the Promised Land.  Moses, however, does not go with them.  He dies before entering the Promised Land, his final resting place a complete mystery.”

Maybe that’s what I should find, the resting place of Moses.  That’d be cool.  I don’t know.  There’s so much, why should I stop at one!  In the words of Lara Croft, “Everything lost is meant to be found.” =)

I had been writing this article before I went to Genius’ site, but then when I got there I was pleasantly surprised to see an article about Moses and the movie The Prince of Egypt.  And then I found a perfect example about what I’d been saying about how most Christians tend to be narrow-minded.  And then right in front of me, “One thing that stuck out to me was that Moses’ brother, Ramsees, gives a slave to Moses as a gift.”  Wow - huge assumption there.  If you scroll up a little bit you’ll read in the last paragraph how there’s “considerable disagreement” over whether or not Ramses II was the correctly identified pharaoh.  This is exactly the blindness I’ve been talking about.  Most Christians assume too much.